🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to reinitiate atomic negotiations with the United States provided that it is approached with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi declared solely negotiations produced results, and shared new appeals had been made by mediators to reopen discussions with the US government. He claimed Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran could not yet authorize the global atomic watchdog to inspect struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Navigating a Complex Course

Araghchi is walking a difficult route since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be operating from a stance of vulnerability, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged more resilient militarily and emotionally from the Israeli-US attack on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to process nuclear material on home soil that it will always maintain" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Discussions Suddenly Ended

The prior phases of talks between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that concluded with the American leader asserting the facilities had been obliterated. Subsequently, European countries employed their privilege to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Iran's diplomats stated they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was decided an domestic cooperative with US participation could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be confident that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could work within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Officials asserted repeatedly they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat the American negotiator only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Current Situation

Iranian officials said the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be resurrected in certain ways if negotiations restart.

Trump last week claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to restart talks, but in private Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from America either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of passivity in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran says dialogue is not part of a show.

Negotiating Stance

In his remarks to the gathering, designed to depict the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the idea of international law, Araghchi said the fortnight-long engagement revealed the clash could not be resolved by military means. He said the attacks commenced with a US demand for an total Iran submission and culminated with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is convinced the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with complete American awareness and collaboration, making faith hard to reestablish.

Negotiations Stays the Primary Answer

The foreign minister stated: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted dialogue; it was America and the western countries that had always tried to enforce their demands during the talks. Diplomacy can still be alive and remains the final answer to address disagreements, but its criteria, guidelines and principles must be adhered to."

"Provided that they speak to the Iranian people with the tone of respect and honor, they will obtain a response in the identical approach."

Restoration and Recovery

In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the battle of recovery and reconstruction, the foreign minister stated he was assured Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than before 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been restored. We learned many lessons from this war; we have come to know our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the opponent."

He added: "We managed to survive this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to obliterate, remains in place. The sites and equipment, if eliminated, will be restored; what is essential is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but did not succeed to shatter. The Iranian people have grown stronger, more integrated, and more backing of the government and the state in the wake of this assault."